|
Incorporating
In-machine Deburring
With Nylon Abrasive Filament Brushes (Nylox®)
This article was published in Cutting Tool Engineering -
August 2000
Clean
Sweep
A different type of
cutting tool is appearing in toolchangers throughout the machining
world. This tool isnt made of cermet, carbide or HSS. It doesnt
have a rake angle or chipbreaker geometry. In fact, it doesnt
even come in a brightly colored plastic box.
Nonetheless, this tool
- the nylon abrasive-filament brush - is showing up in machining
centers everywhere. Why? Because deburring is an intimate part of
the machining process. Often, deburring has dimensional and surface-finish
ramifications that are as important to overall part quality as the
machining process.
As a result, combining operations allows a manufacturer to consolidate
the accountability for dimensional accuracy into a single step.
This provides two benefits: improved system economics and enhanced
part flow.
|

The faces of a connecting rod are deburred after
facemilling using a disc brush fed across the part at 15 ipm with
a 0.125" depth of interference.

By inserting nylon abrasive wheel brushes into the
bore of a connecting rod, burrs on oil holes and similar edges can
be removed.
|
Improving
Economics
Single-point accountability
for machining and deburring encourages optimization of the combined
process for quality and productivity. Variations in burr size due
to changes in machining parameters can be immediately detected and
controlled in this type of single-part-flow arrangement.
If machining and deburring
operations are viewed as stand alone processes, the natural tendency
is to try and optimize them individually. While this approach can
produce positive results, it rarely creates the best, most efficient
system possible.
The following equation
can be used to determine the efficiency of a combined machining/deburring
process:
Process
=
N
Efficiency ____________________________
T + Lm + OHm + D +
LD + OHd
where:
N = Number of parts meeting quality specification
T = Tool cost
Lm = Machining labor cost
OHm = Relevant machining overhead
D = Deburring consumable cost
LD = Deburring labor cost
OHd = Relevant deburring overhead |
There are seven variables in this equation and, therefore, seven areas
in which to improve production performance. Including them in the
same equation allows operators and engineers to calculate the trade-offs
between alternative operating parameters. It spurs questions like,
"Does the financial benefit of a machining-parameter change offset
any higher deburring costs that result?" The following are a
few of the trade-offs that can arise.
Tool path selection vs. deburring cost. Not all tool paths
produce burrs that are the same size. In some cases, simple changes
to the tool path can significantly reduce burr size. In cases where
improved machining reduces the burr size, deburring costs can be reduced
correspondingly.
Tool-change frequency vs. deburring cost. Since cutting tools
represent a considerable expense in the manufacturing process, their
use needs to be managed carefully. However, toolchange frequencies
should take the deburring cost into consideration. If the economics
dictate that extending tool use warrants the higher deburring cost,
then an educated decision has been made. |
An automobile manufacturer
recently realized this trade-off in a very painful way. The automaker
changed the type of cutting tool it used in order to lower costs.
The downside was that the change led to significantly larger burrs
on the workpiece.
As a result of the larger
burrs, the costs for consumable deburring tools more than doubled
and associated labor skyrocketed. A review of the process efficiency
of combining machining and deburring would have shown that the reduction
in cutting tool costs could not be justified based on the increased
deburring costs.
Scrap/rework vs.
machining parameters. For manufacturers of highvalue-added parts,
scrap and rework is an expensive proposition. When burrs get too
large and cannot be removed using established deburring processes,
rework is usually required. Combining the machining and deburring
operations virtually eliminates the cost of the rework/scrap resulting
from burr variation.
Value of machining
time vs. cost of a secondary deburring process. The greatest
value of in-machine deburring is the elimination of a secondary
operation. In many cases, direct labor reductions, applied overhead
reductions and reduced rework costs can justify the time that is
added to a machining operation by incorporating deburring into the
cycle.
Although these trade-offs
do not constitute a comprehensive list, they illustrate that a "big-picture"
perspective on cost reductions is important and can be achieved
by consolidating machining and deburring into a single operation.
|
Improving
Part Flow
In addition to enhanced
system economics, in-machine deburring simplifies part flow and
produces related operational advantages.
For example, consider
the following case history of a manufacturer that performs milling
and deburring operations on aluminum pump components. After the
parts are machined, they are placed in baskets and moved to the
parts cleaning/deburring department, which has several deburring
systems. These include burr benches, tumbling units and an extrusion
deburring machine.
In this production system,
the work-in-process (WIP) inventory sits at multiple locations in
the plant. After machining, the parts are stored in baskets at the
machining center and then moved to the parts cleaning/deburring
department where they wait to be processed. After deburring, the
parts are staged before going to the shipping department.
In the shipping department,
the parts are packaged and shipped to the assembly plant. With this
part flow, the normal lead time from machining to shipping is two
to three weeks. The processing time is a small fraction of the total
lead time, but the parts are queued and processed in batches based
on available resources and departmental priorities.
|

Wheel brushes can be interpolated in the bores of
cylinder heads using tool paths that account for the numerous bore-size
changes.
Under pressure to reduce
lead time and capital allocated to WIP, the manufacturer implemented
in-machine deburring. Doing this did not require a major capital
investment, and it allowed the parts to flow directly from the machining
center to the shipping department, eliminating two queue locations.
The result was a 50 percent reduction in lead time and WIP.
In addition, removing several high volume parts from the parts cleaning/deburring
department shortened the queues in that area and created additional
WIP reductions.
In this case, the part flow could have been improved by moving the
burr benches from the parts cleaning/deburring department to the
machining center. This option was not pursued because in-machine
deburring offered better part consistency and fit into the plants
long-term goal of establishing untended machining processes wherever
possible.
Regardless of the deburring
method, the key to a successful deburring operation is burr minimization.
The selection of the proper cutting tools, tool paths and tool-change
frequencies can significantly reduce burr size. If burr minimization
through improved machining is not sufficient to produce the dimensional
results and surface finishes required, nylon abrasive-filament brushes
are an extremely effective in-machine solution.
|
Selective
Aggression
Nylon abrasive-filament
brushes are "edge-selective aggressive." This means that
the brushs filaments act aggressively when applied to an edge
but not on flat surfaces. As a result, they refine surface finishes
without measurably changing part dimensions.
This selective cutting
action is due to the pressure-sensitive nature of nylon abrasive
brushes. When a filament is filing across an edge, the cutting pressure
is high due to the small contact area. However, the pressure drops
dramatically when the same filament begins to move across a flat
surface. Hence, a brush that produces a 0.015" radius on an
exotic aerospace part also can be used to reduce the surface finish
on a camshaft to under 20µin.
Typically, nylon abrasive
brushes can be used in CNC equipment by copying the existing machining
programs and making slight changes. For example, the tool path for
a disc brush is very similar to the tool path for a facemill. The
major differences are the required spindle speed, feed rate and
depth of interference (analogous to DOC).
In some operations,
it is also necessary to take two passes across the part, with the
brushes rotating in opposite directions for each pass. The need
for two passes is based on burr size and orientation.
|

After in-machine deburring, this cylinder head doesn't
require any manual deburring.
Unlike cutting tools, nylon abrasive brushes do not require
exact positioning. The brushes easily conform to various shapes,
making them extremely forgiving. Typically, positioning within 0.030"of
the ideal location will produce acceptable results. Although this
window of acceptability varies with brush size and application,
most operating windows are large and do not require significant
programming time to achieve. This ability to handle part variation
is especially beneficial on castings, because the brushes compensate
for casting tolerances.
The most complicated aspect of an in-machine deburring application
relates to the location and style of clamping fixtures. In CNC machining
centers with horizontal spindles, parts are commonly fixtured with
clamps that reach around the edges of the part. Although these clamps
do not interfere with cutting tool paths, they occasionally interfere
with brushes that are often larger than cutting tools. If clamps
interfere with the flow of filaments toward the target edge, they
may need to be repositioned or exchanged for a clamp that does not
reach past the edge of the part.
|
Case
Histories
The following examples
of in-machine deburring are from the diesel engine manufacturing
industry, where nylon abrasive brushes are used to deburr and radius-
and surface-finish engine parts.
Connecting Rods.
Two applications exist for connecting rods. The first is deburring
the face of the connecting rod after facemilling. This application
involves feeding a disc brush across the part at a rate of 15 ipm
and a 0.125" depth of interference. This deburring step can
be easily accomplished while the part is fixtured for facemilling.
Unlike cutting tools,
nylon abrasive brushes do not require exact positioning. The brushes
easily conform to various shapes, making them extremely forgiving.
The second application
is to deburr the crank bore (and wrist-pin bore in some cases) after
machining. Nylon abrasive wheel brushes are well suited for bore
deburring. By interpolating a brush in the bore, burrs created on
oil holes and similar edges can be removed.
The connecting rods
in this case are large (a crank bore exceeds 10") and made
of alloy steel. The exit burrs on the crank bore that result from
the boring operation are extremely large, with a root thickness
of more than 0.020". Since burrs of this type cannot be removed
with nylon abrasive brushes, the user designed a cutting tool that
removed the primary burr. After removing the large burr with a cutting
tool, the secondary burr was easily removed with a nylon abrasive
brush, which also produced an edge radius of about 0.005".
This is an excellent
example of the efficiency gains that can be achieved by combining
machining and deburring operations. In addition to productivity
gains in excess of 20 percent, the user said that the greatest benefit
of the in-machine deburring solution was consistent part quality.
Every connecting rod on every shift received the same amount of
deburring. As a result, resources spent resolving quality complaints
were reduced and the process engineers could spend time working
on projects that offered a payback rather than resolving deburring
problems.
|

Engine blocks are ideal candidates for in-machine
deburring. A disc brush is rotated in the opposite direction of
the cutting tool and is fed along a similar tool path.
Cylinder Heads.
The steps in the bore of a cylinder head have microburrs that must
be removed and nylon abrasive wheel brushes are ideal for this application.
Wheel brushes can be interpolated in each of the bores using tool
paths that account for the numerous changes in bore size. Following
the deburring operation, all of the sharp edges are broken and the
part does not require any manual deburring.
One critical operating parameter for nylon abrasive brushes is speed.
Surface speed should always be less than 3,500 sfm. Excessive speed
prevents the brushes from working effectively because the filaments
do not have sufficient time to file across the part edges. In addition,
excessive speed generates heat, which can cause the filaments to
begin to soften and melt. In a softened state, the filaments lose
nearly all of their deburring ability.
Engine Blocks. Many engine-block surfaces have burrs resulting
from various milling operations. One such surface is a crankshaft
bearing journal. A disc brush can effectively deburr this type of
surface. It is rotated in the opposite direction of the cutting
tool and is fed along a similar tool path. At 15 ipm, the brush
uniformly deburrs the sharp edges left by the machining operations.
Machining and deburring
are related elements of the same process producing a part with the
dimensional and surface finish characteristics that the customer
requires. Keeping these processes separate will raise operating
costs and extend lead times.
Implementing in-machine
deburring with nylon abrasive brushes is an inexpensive way to make
operational improvements with a quick payback.
|
|